| |
Civil society groups work hard for the well being of all things livings. There efforts have, while not exactly turning things around dramatically, still, been good enough to keep some of those social monsters such as poverty, disenfranchisement and frustration at bay. At least in some highly selective geographies for very small, carefully selected communities. The question that needs to be asked is this: Why is it that there is such a small impact of all the millions and millions of dollars that have been spent by civil groups in the name of social welfare? The answer is simple and horrible. Corruption. From the moment a dollar gets into the hands of a donor agent all the way down, that dollar is whittled away until hardly anything reaches the people who were the primary reason why some good Samaritan somewhere gave that dollar.
The same also goes for governments, IFIs, private sector organizations etc. Every single one of these has been guilty of manipulative action and the exercising of hidden agendas that are selfish in the extreme. The activities of such groups has further escalated the problem and has directly led to severe poverty and the spawning of collateral practices that compound it to a point of no return.
This is a terrible state of affairs and none of our efforts to make this earth a better place for all to live in would mean anything at all if this status quo continues. Thus, for the GMSL, the very idea of social action is steeped in ensuring a governance model that will eradicate this thinking completely from the minds and hearts of those who have managed, over the years, to "make an unfair living" out of the pain of others. We know that engineering that is not easy since, unfortunately, there are many civil groups on the other side of that great divide.
Yet, we are hopeful. If civil society organizations are to be key players in sustainable development then our action to ensure ownership, alignment, harmonization, managing for results and mutual accountability have to have real and demonstrable meaning to those who are targeted by assistance. This requires us to ensure that there will not be the slightest hint of thieving, cheating or thuggery in our actions and that our actions will not contain the slightest hint of a desire for profit, fame or recognition. Additionally, the GMSL firmly believes that when attempting to ensure sustainability to the results of action, such action should take place within a framework of consolidated effort that takes into consideration social, cultural and economic realities of the country. Thus, while lobbying the government and external players for a better method of governance, the GMSL attempts to give specific communities the strength and resilience it needs in all aspects of life and living. This involves working closely with the people to assist them to map out their own ideas of sustainable development and help them achieve those goals - even if helping them means that we should remove ourselves from their presence without further ado. This is the reason for the most important program of the GMSL - the Governance and Consolidated Action (GCAP) program. |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
World poverty is nothing new and at various times, various entities have attempted to reduce and/or eliminate the condition using every socio-political paradigm in existence. All have, historically, been proved to be impressive failures. In the past few decades, people oriented thinking has steadily decreased while force based principles such as capitalism, nepotism, dictatorship and terror have surged to the forefront of common thinking as viable forms of governance with the result that poverty has sky rocketed. The reason is simple. All of those mechanisms are geared to serve a few at great cost to many.
While the GMSL is neither for or against any of these, it does recognize that all of them have contributed in no small measure to poverty continuation and poverty production. For us, the problem with such methods is that they are models that disregard the wellbeing of the majority and thus, cannot be viewed as models of good governance. Additionally, action within such models is geared by definition to further profit and not sustainability.
Therefore, our work has been cut out for us. On the one side we incessantly lobby the authorities to install mechanisms for ruling the country that does not involve any of the spectrum of corrupt practices that go against the core of natural justice and on the other hand, we work with the people through better alternatives to provide proof of best practices for any and all who care to see. We hope, through our efforts, that some day, all of the people of this earth will see clearly that the well being of all of the people is crucial for the well being of each individual person.
|
|
|
|
|
|